Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. He is a conservative. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. It was billed as a meeting of titans and that it was not. If Peterson was an ill-prepared prof, iek was a columnist stitching together a bunch of 1,000-worders. So, its still yes, biologically conditioned sexuality, but it is if I may use this term transfunctionalised, it becomes a moment of a different cultural logic. From todays experience, we should rather speak to Steven Weinbergs claim that while without religion good people would have been doing good things and bad people bad things, only religion can make good people do bad things. Zizek and Peterson went head-to-head recently at a debate in Toronto. Let me mention the change enacted by Christianity. [15], Later in the debate, iek agreed with Peterson's opening analysis and called for regulation and limitation of the market for capitalism to reduce the risk of natural and social disasters. "post-modern neo-marxists" and it's strange not to understand or at least know It can well secretly invert the standard renunciation accomplished to benefit others. [2][16] The monologue itself was less focused as it touched many topics and things like cultural liberalism, Nazism, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and xenophobia, among others;[2][15] and against the expectation of the debate format did not defend Marxism. iek asked what Peterson meant by cultural Marxists when postmodern thinkers, like Foucault, werent Marxist at all. What qualifies them to pass a judgement in such a delicate matter? Id like the share the debate with a hearing impaired friend. Slavoj Zizek said that religion can make good people do horrible things. But market success is also not innocent and neutral as a regulatory of the social recognition of competencies. Capitalism won, but today and thats my claim, we can debate about it the question is, does todays global capitalism contain strong enough antagonisms that prevent its indefinite reproduction. Good evening and welcome to the Sony Center for Performing Arts. First, a brief introductory remark. And if you think interesting because of it. 76.3K ,809 . TikTok Zizek is my dad (@zizekcumsock): "From the Zizek-Peterson debate. No. It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. Did we really move too much in the direction of equality? I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. This I think is the true game changed. White, multi-culturalist liberals embody the lie of identity politics. clear these are coherent thoughts from the same thinker. What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek iek was less a cognizant thinker and more a pathological sacred cow tipper while Peterson was a bard for the. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. The experience that we have of our lives from within, the story we tell ourselves about ourselves, in order to account for what we are doing is and this is what I call ideology fundamentally a lie. Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. But precisely due to the marketing, Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video Jordan B Peterson 6.5M subscribers Subscribe 86K 4.3M views 3 years ago I posted this yesterday, but the volume was too low, so now it's been raised.. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. It has been said of the debate that " nothing is a greater waste of time ." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. He seemed, in person, quite gentle. The tone of the debate was also noted to be very Both rejected happiness as a primary goal for individuals and societies. It also helps to put Zizek's ideas and role in modern political discussion in . First, on how happiness is often the wrong Hitler provided a story, a plot, which was precisely that of a Jewish plot: we are in this mess because of the Jews. [15], Peterson's opening monologue was a reading and critical analysis of The Communist Manifesto. something wrong was said therein, you ought to engage the content rather than meaningful cause beyond the mere struggle for pleasurable survival. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. [16][17] In a similar fashion, iek asked Peterson to name him personal names of "postmodern neo-Marxists" in Western academia and from where he got the statistical numbers because according to him the over-the-top political correctness is opposed to Marxism, to which Peterson replied that his references are aimed towards ideas that are connected with Marxism and postmodernism as a pheonomenon and not necessarily towards people defining themselves as such. 2 Piano Mono - moshimo sound design. But when youve said that, youve said everything. I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Maybe that's why last night I finally caved and watched Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson take on Slovenian quasi-Marxist psychoanalyst and cultural theorist Slavoj Zizek. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript I've talked to (which, unfortunately were more fanboys than rigorous His remarks were just as rambling as Petersons, veering from Trump and Sanders to Dostoevsky to the refugee crisis to the aesthetics of Nazism. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. No. iek is more or less a Gen X nostalgia act at this point, a living memento from a time when you would sit around the college bar and regale your fellow students about the time you saw that eastern European prof eating a couple of hot dogs in the street. intellectuals). If we are left to ourselves, if everything is historically conditioned and relative, then there is nothing preventing us from indulging in our lowest tendencies. However, I would like to add here a couple of qualifications. It is often claimed that true or not that religion makes some otherwise bad people do good things. He's the sort of aging quitter we all hope to never be. They play the victim as much as their enemies. But it did reveal one telling commonality. A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. Two Teams Per Debate Argue For Opposing Positions On An Issue. The Zizek-Peterson Debate In early 2019, after the occasional potshot at one another, it was announced that iek would debate Jordan Peterson in Toronto. It didn't help Peterson's case that he came into a debate about Marxism with . Peterson, in his opening remarks, noted that scalped tickets were selling at higher prices than the Maple Leafs playoff game happening on the other side of town. Therefore they retreat. Secret Spice Girls dance parties of the wives of anti-western morality police. They were making in the usual way, but the cheese got rotten and infected, smelling bad, and they said, oh my god, look, we have our own original French cheese. Again, the wager of democracy is that and thats the subtle thing not against competence and so on, but that political power and competence or expertise should be kept apart. [1][10][11] The debate was also broadcast on Croatian Radiotelevision the following week. Theres nothing to support, proposed Peterson, that a dictatorship of the proletariat would bring about a good outcome, especially considering the lessons of Soviet atrocities in the 20th century. interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. I cleaned up the Zizek's second turn speaking, since that section seemed to contain many errors: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs7mNIUsYt9kWcdO785ec_dEWmEHLo92yTso0CVtxNk/edit?usp=sharing. live commentary is quite funny. Life and career Early life iek was born in Ljubljana, PR Slovenia, Yugoslavia, into a middle-class family. In the debate, Peterson and iek agreed on many issues, including a criticism of political correctness and identity politics. It seems that our countries are run relatively well, but is the mess the so-called rogue countries find themselves in not connected to how we interact with them? Rules for Life, as if there were such things. Copyright 2007-2023 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK PLUS, SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by Freethink Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Zizek is particularly culpable here, for It has been said of the debate that "nothing is a greater waste of time." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. So as I saw it, the task of this debate was to at least clarify our differences."[24]. Web nov 14, 2022. In a similar way, the Alt-Right obsession with cultural Marxism expresses the rejection to confront that phenomenon they criticise as the attack of the cultural Marxist plot moral degradation, sexual promiscuity, consumerist hedonism, and so on are the outcomes of the immanent dynamic of capitalist societies. Similarly, he's crusading against The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. In spite of protests here and there, we will probably continue to slide towards some kind of apocalypse, awaiting large catastrophes to awaken us. They both wanted the same thing: capitalism with regulation, which is what every sane person wants. The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. Its not just that in spite of all our natural and cultural differences the same divine sparks dwells in everyone. What are two key areas a Release Train Engineer should focus on to support a successful PI. Competencies for what? This is how refugees are created. "[1][6] According to Matthew Sharpe writing for The Conversation, .mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px}.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0}, the term 'cultural Marxism' moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist Jordan Peterson was protesting a Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. Im far from a simple social constructionism here. He is a dazzling. authors with occasional bridges being thrown accross. T. S. Eliot, the great conservative, wrote, quote what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the work of art which preceded it. One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. A good criticism is the one made by Benjamin Studebaker. In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. A debate speech format follows the below pattern. El debate Peterson-iek, oficialmente titulado Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, fue un debate entre el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson (crtico del marxismo) y el filsofo esloveno Slavoj iek ( comunista y hegeliano) sobre la relacin entre marxismo, capitalismo y felicidad. Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. Furthermore, I think that social power and authority cannot be directly grounded in competence. Last night, Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek debated each other at the Sony Centre in Toronto. When somebody tries to convince me, in spite of all these problems, there is a light at the end of the tunnel, my instant reply is, Yes, and its another train coming towards us. Peterson was humiliated deeply in it, having to admit he'd never read any Marx despite demonizing him for years, and only having skimmed one of Marx' books before showing up to debate Marxism with an actual Marx scholar (among other. Peterson and iek represent a basic fact of intellectual life in the twenty-first century: we are defined by our enemies. Debate is a process that involves formal discourse on a particular topic, often including a moderator and audience. We are responsible for our burdens. But there was one truly fascinating moment in the evening. Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. One hated communism. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. Peterson is neither a racist nor a misogynist. Conservative thinkers claim that the origin of our crisis is the loss of our reliance on some transcendent divinity. it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. The twentieth century left was defined by its opposition to the truth fundamental tendencies of modernity: the reign of capital with its aggressive market competition, the authoritarian bureaucratic state power. The pathological element is the husbands need for jealousy as the only way for him to sustain his identity. he event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian, Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychology professor and author. Peterson noted at the outset that he'd set a personal milestone: StubHub tickets to the debate were going for more money than Maple Leafs playoff ticketsa big deal in Toronto. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. Pity Jordan Peterson. The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. self-reproducing nature to ("the historical necessity of progress towards Related research topic ideas. China in the last decades is arguably the greatest economic success story in human history. officially desire. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us.